Our DNA is written in Objective-C

John Carmack's iPhone Letter

Contained within the ZIP file with the “Wolfenstein 3D” source code is this lengthy but very interesting letter by gaming god John Carmack.

iPhone development*

By John Carmack, Technical Director, Id Software


I had been frustrated for over a year with the fact that we didn’t have any iPhone development projects going internally at Id.  I love my iPhone, and I think the App Store is an extremely important model for the software business.  Unfortunately, things have conspired against us being out early on the platform.


Robert Duffy and I spent a week early on starting to bring up the Orcs & Elves DS codebase on the iPhone, which would have been a nice project for a launch title, but it wasn’t going to be a slam dunk.  The iPhone graphics hardware is a more capable superset of the DS hardware (the driver overhead is far, far worse, though), but the codebase was fairly DS specific, with lots of Nintendo API calls all over the place.  I got the basics drawing by converting things to OpenGL ES, but I was still on the fence as to whether the best approach to get all the picky little special effects working would be a complete GL conversion, or a DS graphics library emulation layer.  Coupled with the fact that the entire user interface would need to be re-thought and re-tested, it was clear that the project would take several months of development time, and need artists and designers as well as coding work.  I made the pitch that this would still be a good plan, but the idMobile team was already committed to the Wolfenstein RPG project for conventional Java and BREW mobile phones, and Anna didn’t want to slip a scheduled milestone on the established, successful development directions there for a speculative iPhone project.


After thinking about the platform’s capabilities a bit more, I had a plan for an aggressive, iPhone specific project that we actually started putting some internal resources on, but the programmer tasked with it didn’t work out and was let go.  In an odd coincidence, an outside development team came to us with a proposal for a similar project on the Wii, and we decided to have them work on the iPhone project with us instead.  We should be announcing this project soon, and it is cool.  It is also late, but that’s software development…


Late last year, the mobile team had finished up all the planned versions of Wolfenstein RPG, but EA had suggested that in addition to the hundreds of customized versions they normally produce for all the various mobile phones, they were interested in having another team do a significant media quality improvement on it for the iPhone.  While Wolf RPG is a very finely crafted product for traditional cell phones, it wasn’t designed for the iPhone’s interface or capabilities, so it wouldn’t be an ideal project, but it should still be worth doing.  When we got the first build to test, I was pleased with how the high res artwork looked, but I was appalled at how slow it ran.  It felt like one of the mid range java versions, not better than the high end BREW as I expected.  I started to get a sinking feeling.  I searched around in the level for a view that would confirm my suspicion, and when I found a clear enough view of some angled geometry I saw the tell-tale mid-polygon affine swim in the texture as I rotated.  They were using the software rasterizer on the iPhone.  I patted myself on the back a bit for the fact that the combination of my updated mobile renderer, the intelligent level design / restricted movement, and the hi-res artwork made the software renderer almost visually indistinguishable from a hardware renderer, but I was very unhappy about the implementation.


I told EA that we were NOT going to ship that as the first Id Software product on the iPhone.  Using the iPhone’s hardware 3D acceleration was a requirement, and it should be easy — when I did the second generation mobile renderer (written originally in java) it was layered on top of a class I named TinyGL that did the transform / clip / rasterize operations fairly close to OpenGL semantics, but in fixed point and with both horizontal and vertical rasterization options for perspective correction.  The developers came back and said it would take two months and exceed their budget.


Rather than having a big confrontation over the issue, I told them to just send the project to me and I would do it myself.  Cass Everitt had been doing some personal work on the iPhone, so he helped me get everything set up for local iPhone development here, which is a lot more tortuous than you would expect from an Apple product.  As usual, my off the cuff estimate of “Two days!” was optimistic, but I did get it done in four, and the game is definitely more pleasant at 8x the frame rate. 

And I had fun doing it.


Since we now were doing something resembling “real work” on the iPhone at the office, we kept it going at a low priority.  One of the projects Cass was tinkering around with at home was a port of Quake 3, and we talked about different interface strategies every now and then. 

Unfortunately, when we sat down to try a few things out, we found that

Q3 wasn’t really running fast enough to make good judgments on iPhone control systems.  The hardware should be capable enough, but it will take some architectural changes to the rendering code to get the most out of it.


I was just starting to set up a framework to significantly revise Q3 when I considered the possibility of just going to an earlier codebase to experiment with initially.  If we wanted to factor performance out of the equation, we could go all the way back to Wolfenstein 3D, the grandfather of FPS games.  It had the basic run and gun play that has been built on for fifteen years, but it originally ran on 286 computers, so it should be pretty trivial to hold a good framerate on the iPhone.


Wolfenstein was originally written in Borland C and TASM for DOS, but I had open sourced the code long ago, and there were several projects that had updated the original code to work on OpenGL and modern operating systems.  After a little looking around, I found Wolf3D Redux at http://wolf3dredux.sourceforge.net/.  One of the development comments about “removal of the gangrenous 16 bit code” made me smile.


It was nice and simple to download, extract data from a commercial copy of Wolfenstein, and start playing on a PC at high resolution.  Things weren’t as smooth as they should be at first, but two little changes made a huge difference — going at VBL synced update rates with one tic per cycle instead of counting milliseconds to match 70 hz game tics, and fixing a bug with premature integralization in the angle update code that caused mouse movement to be notchier than it should be.  The game was still fun to play after all these years, and I began to think that it might be worthwhile to actually make a product out of Wolfenstein on the iPhone, rather than just using it as a testbed, assuming the controls worked out as fun to play.  The simple episodic nature of the game would make it easy to split up into a $0.99 version with just the first episode, a more expensive version with all sixty levels, and we could release Spear of Destiny if there was additional demand.  I was getting a little ahead of myself without a fun-to-play demonstration of feasibility on the iPhone, but the idea of moving the entire line of classic Id titles over — Wolf, Doom, Quake, Quake 2, and Quake Arena, was starting to sound like a real good idea.


I sent an email to the Wolf 3D Redux project maintainer to see if he might be interested in working on an iPhone project with us, but it had been over a year since the last update, and he must have moved on to other things.  I thought about it a bit, and decided that I would go ahead and do the project myself.  The “big projects” at Id are always top priority, but the systems programming work in Rage is largely completed, and the team hasn’t been gated on me for anything in a while.  There is going to be memory and framerate optimization  work going on until it ships, but I decided that I could spend a couple weeks away from Rage to work on the iPhone exclusively.  Cass continued to help with iPhone system issues, I drafted Eric Will to create the few new art assets, and Christian Antkow did the audio work, but this was the first time I had taken full responsibility for an entire product in a very long time.


*Design notes*


The big question was how “classic” should we leave the game?  I have bought various incarnations of Super Mario Bros on at least four Nintendo platforms, so I think there is something to be said for the classics, but there were so many options for improvement.  The walls and sprites in the game were originally all 64 x 64 x 8 bit color, and the sound effects were either 8khz / 8 bit mono or (sometimes truly awful) FM synth sounds.  Changing these would be trivial from a coding standpoint.  In the end, I decided to leave the game media pretty much unchanged, but tweak the game play a little bit, and build a new user framework around the core play experience.  This decision was made a lot easier by the fact that we were right around the 10 meg over-the-air app download limit with the converted media.  This would probably be the only Id project to ever be within hailing distance of that mark, so we should try to fit it in.


The original in-game status bar display had to go, because the user’s thumbs were expected to cover much of that area.  We could have gone with just floating stats, but I thought that BJ’s face added a lot of personality to the game, so I wanted to leave that in the middle of the screen.  Unfortunately, the way the weapon graphics were drawn, especially the knife, caused issues if they were just drawn above the existing face graphics.  I had a wider background created for the face, and used the extra space for directional damage indicators, which was a nice improvement in the gameplay.  It was a tough decision to stop there on damage feedback, because a lot of little things with view roll kicks, shaped screen blends, and even double vision or blurring effects, are all pretty easy to add and quite effective, but getting farther away from “classic”.


I started out with an explicit “open door” button like the original game, but I quickly decided to just make that automatic.  Wolf and Doom had explicit “use” buttons, but we did away with them on Quake with contact or proximity activation on everything.  Modern games have generally brought explicit activation back by situationally overriding attack, but hunting for push walls in Wolf by shooting every tile wouldn’t work out.  There were some combat tactics involving explicitly shutting doors that are gone with automatic-use, and some secret push walls are trivially found when you pick up an item in front of them now, but this was definitely the right decision.


You could switch weapons in Wolf, but almost nobody actually did, except for occasionally conserving ammo with the chain gun, or challenges like “beat the game with only the knife”.  That functionality didn’t justify the interface clutter.


The concept of “lives” was still in wolf, with 1-ups and extras at certain scores.  We ditched that in Doom, which was actually sort of innovative at the time, since action games on computers and consoles were still very much take-the-quarter arcade oriented.  I miss the concept of “score” in a lot of games today, but I think the finite and granular nature of the enemies, tasks, and items in Wolf is better suited to end-of-level stats, so I removed both lives and score, but added persistent awards for par time, 100% kills, 100% secrets, and 100% treasures.  The award alone wasn’t enough incentive to make treasures relevant, so I turned them into uncapped +1 health crumbs, which makes you always happy to find them.


I increased the pickup radius for items, which avoided the mild frustration of having to sometimes make a couple passes at an item when you are cleaning up a room full of stuff.


I doubled the starting ammo on a fresh level start.  If a player just got killed, it isn’t good to frustrate them even more with a severe ammo conservation constraint.  There was some debate about the right way to handle death:  respawn with the level as is (good in that you can keep making progress if you just get one more shot off each time, bad in that weapon pickups are no longer available), respawn just as you entered the level (good — keep your machinegun / chaingun, bad — you might have 1 health), or, what I chose, restart the map with basic stats just as if you had started the map from the menu.


There are 60 levels in the original Wolf dataset, and I wanted people to have the freedom to easily jump around between different levels and skills, so there is no enforcement of starting at the beginning.  The challenge is to /complete /a level, not /get to/ a level.  It is fun to start filling in the grid of level completions and awards, and it often feels better to try a different level after a death.  The only exception to the start-anywhere option is that you must find the entrance to the secret levels before you can start a new game there.


In watching the early testers, the biggest issue I saw was people sliding off doors before they opened, and having to maneuver back around to go through.  In Wolf, as far as collision detection was concerned, everything was just a 64×64 tile map that was either solid or passable. 

Doors changed the tile state when they completed opening or began closing.  There was discussion about magnetizing the view angle towards doors, or somehow beveling the areas around the doors, but it turned out to be pretty easy to make the door tiles only have a solid central core against the player, so players would slide into the “notch” with the door until it opened.  This made a huge improvement in playability.


There is definitely something to be said for a game that loads in a few seconds, with automatic save of your position when you exit.  I did a lot of testing by playing the game, exiting to take notes in the iPhone notepad, then restarting Wolf to resume playing.  Not having to skip through animated logos at the start is nice.  We got this pretty much by accident with the very small and simple nature of Wolf, but I think it is worth specifically optimizing for in future titles.


The original point of this project was to investigate FPS control schemes for the iPhone, and a lot of testing was done with different schemes and parameters.  I was sort of hoping that there would be one “obviously correct” way to control it, but it doesn’t turn out to be the case.


For a casual first time player, it is clearly best to have a single forward / back / turn control stick and a fire button.


Tilt control is confusing for first exposure to the game, but I think it does add to the fun factor when you use it.  I like the tilt-to-move option, but people that play a lot of driving games on the iPhone seem to like tilt-to-turn, where you are sort of driving BJ through the levels.  Tilt needs a decent deadband, and a little bit of filtering is good.  I was surprised that the precision on the accelerometer was only a couple degrees, which makes it poorly suited for any direct mapped usage, but it works well enough as a relative speed control.


Serious console gamers tend to take to the “dual stick” control modes easily for movement, but the placement of the fire button is problematic.  Using an index finger to fire is effective but uncomfortable.  I see many players just move the thumb to fire, using strafe movement for fine tuning aim.  It is almost tempting to try to hijack the side volume switch for fire, but the ergonomics aren’t quite right, and it would be very un-Apple-like, and wouldn’t be available on the iPod touch (plus I couldn’t figure out how…).


We tried a tilt-forward to fire to allow you to keep your thumbs on the dual control sticks, but it didn’t work out very well.  Forward / back tilt has the inherent variable holding angle problem for anything, and a binary transition point is hard for people to hold without continuous feedback.  Better visual feedback on the current angle and trip point would help, but we didn’t pursue it much.  For a game with just, say, a rocket launcher, shake/shove-to-fire might be interesting, but it isn’t any good for wolf.


It was critical for the control sticks to be analog, since digital direction pads have proven quite ineffective on touch screens due to progressive lack of registration during play.  With an analog stick, the player has continuous visual feedback of the stick position in most cases, so they can self correct.  Tuning the deadband and slide off behavior are important.


Level design criteria has advanced a lot since Wolfenstein, but I wasn’t going to open up the option of us modifying the levels, even though the start of the first level is painfully bad for a first time player, with the tiny, symmetric rooms for them to get their nose mashed into walls and turned around in.  The idea is that you started the game in a prison cell after bashing your guard over the head, but even with the exact same game tools, we would lead the player through the experience much better now.  Some of the levels are still great fun to play, and it is interesting to read Tom Hall and John Romero’s designer notes in the old hint manuals, but the truth is that some levels were scrubbed out in only a couple hours, unlike the long process of testing and adjustment that goes on today.


It was only after I thought I was basically done with the game that Tim Willits pointed out the elephant in the gameplay room — for 95% of players, wandering around lost in a maze isn’t very much fun. 

Implementing an automap was pretty straightforward, and it probably added more to the enjoyment of the game than anything else.  Before adding this, I thought that only a truly negligible amount of people would actually finish all 60 levels, but now I think there might be enough people that get through them to justify bringing the Spear of Destiny levels over later.


When I was first thinking about the project I sort of assumed that we wouldn’t bother with music, but Wolf3D Redux already had code that converted the old id music format into ogg, so we would up with support at the beginning, and it turned out pretty good.  We wound up ripping the red book audio tracks from one of the later commercial Wolf releases and encoding at a different bitrate, but I probably wouldn’t have bothered if not for the initial support.  It would have been nice to re-record the music with a high quality MIDI synth, but we didn’t have the original MIDI source, and Christian said that the conversion back from the id music format to midi was a little spotty, and would take a fair amount of work to get right.  I emailed Bobby Prince, the original composer, to see if he had any high quality versions still around, but he didn’t get back with me.


The game is definitely simplistic by modern standards, but it still has its moments.  Getting the drop on a brown shirt just as he is pulling his pistol from the holster.  Making an SS do the “twitchy dance” with your machine gun.  Rounding a corner and unloading your weapon on … a potted plant.  Simplistic plays well on the iPhone.


*Programming notes*


Cass and I got the game running on the iPhone very quickly, but I was a little disappointed that various issues around the graphics driver, the input processing, and the process scheduling meant that doing a locked-at-60-hz game on the iPhone wasn’t really possible.  I hope to take these up with Apple at some point in the future, but it meant that Wolf would be a roughly two tick game.  It is only “roughly” because there is no swapinterval support, and the timer scheduling has a lot of variability in it.  It doesn’t seem to matter all that much, the play is still smooth and fun, but I would have liked to at least contrast it with the perfect limit case.


It turns out that there were a couple issues that required work even at 30hz.  For a game like Wolf, any PC that is in use today is essentially infinitely fast, and the Wolf3D Redux code did some things that were convenient but wasteful.  That is often exactly the right thing to do, but the iPhone isn’t quite as infinitely fast as a desktop PC.


Wolfenstein (and Doom) originally drew the characters as sparse stretched columns of solid pixels (vertical instead of horizontal for efficiency in interleaved planar mode-X VGA), but OpenGL versions need to generate a square texture with transparent pixels.  Typically this is then drawn by either alpha blending or alpha testing a big quad that is mostly empty space.  You could play through several early levels of Wolf without this being a problem, but in later levels there are often large fields of dozens of items that stack up to enough overdraw to max out the GPU and drop the framerate to 20 fps.  The solution is to bound the solid pixels in the texture and only draw that restricted area, which solves the problem with most items, but Wolf has a few different heavily used ceiling lamp textures that have a small lamp at the top and a thin but full width shadow at the bottom.  A single bounds doesn’t exclude many texels, so I wound up including two bounds, which made them render many times faster.


The other problem was CPU related.  Wolf3d Redux used the original ray casting scheme to find out which walls were visible, then called a routine to draw each wall tile with OpenGL calls.  The code looked something like this:


DrawWall( int wallNum ) {

    char   name[128];

    texture_t   *tex;

    sprintf( name, “walls/%d.tga”, wallNum );

    tex = FindTexture( name );



texture_t FindTexture( const char *name ) {

    int   i;

    for ( i = 0 ; i < numTextures ; i++ ) {

       if ( !strcmp( name, texture[name]->name ) ) {

          return texture[name];






I winced when I saw that at the top of the instruments profile, but again, you could play all the early levels that only had twenty or thirty visible tiles at a time without it actually being a problem. 

However, some later levels with huge open areas could have over a hundred visible tiles, and that led to 20hz again.  The solution was a trivial change to something resembling:


DrawWall( int wallNum ) {

    texture_t   *tex = wallTextures[wallNum];




Wolf3D Redux included a utility that extracted the variously packed media from the original games and turned them into cleaner files with modern formats.  Unfortunately, an attempt at increasing the quality of the original art assets by using hq2x graphics scaling to turn the 64×64 art into better filtered 128×128 arts was causing lots of sprites to have fringes around them due to incorrect handling of alpha borders.  It wasn’t possible to fix it up at load time, so I had to do the proper outline-with-color-but-0-alpha operations in a modified version of the extractor.  I also decided to do all the format conversion and mip generation there, so there was no significant CPU time spent during texture loading, helping to keep the load time down.  I experimented with the PVRTC formats, but while it would have been ok for the walls, unlike with DXT you can’t get a lossless alpha mask out of it, so it wouldn’t have worked for the sprites.  Besides, you really don’t want to mess with the carefully chosen pixels in a 64×64 block very much when you scale it larger than the screen on occasion.


I also had to make one last minute hack change to the original media — the Red Cross organization had asserted their trademark rights over red crosses (sigh) some time after we released the original Wolfenstein 3D game, and all new game releases must not use red crosses on white backgrounds as health symbols.  One single, solitary sprite graphic got modified for this release.


User interface code was the first thing I started making other programmers do at Id when I no longer had to write every line of code in a project, because I usually find it tedious and unrewarding.  This was such a small project that I went ahead and did it myself, and I learned an interesting little thing.  Traditionally, UI code has separate drawing and input processing code, but on a touchscreen device, it often works well to do a combined “immediate mode interface”, with code like this:


if ( DrawPicWithTouch( x, y, w, h, name ) ) {

    menuState = newState;



Doing that for the floating user gameplay input controls would introduce a frame of response latency, but for menus and such, it works very well.


One of the worst moments during the development was when I was getting ready to hook up the automatic savegame on app exit.  There wasn’t any savegame code.  I went back and grabbed the original 16 bit dos code for load / save game, but when I compiled I found out that the Wolf3d Redux codebase had changed a lot more than just the near / far pointer issues, asm code, and comment blocks.  The changes were sensible things, like grouping more variables into structures and defining enums for more things, but it did mean that I wasn’t dealing with the commercially tested core that I thought I was.  It also meant that I was a lot more concerned about a strange enemy lerping through the world bug I had seen a couple times.


I seriously considered going back to the virgin codebase and reimplementing the OpenGL rendering from scratch.  The other thing that bothered me about the Redux codebase was that it was basically a graft of the Wolf3D code into the middle of a gutted Quake 2 codebase.  This was cool in some ways, because it gave us a console, cvars, and the system / OpenGL portable framework, and it was clear the original intention was to move towards multiplayer functionality, but it was a lot of bloat.  The original wolf code was only a few dozen C files, while the framework around it here was several times that.


Looking through the original code brought back some memories.  I stopped signing code files years ago, but the top of WL_MAIN.C made me smile:





                           WOLFENSTEIN 3-D


                      An Id Software production


                           by John Carmack





It wasn’t dated, but that would have been in 1991.


In the end, I decided to stick with the Redux codebase, but I got a lot more free with hacking big chunks of it out.  I reimplemented load / save game (fixing the inevitable pointer bugs involved), and by littering asserts throughout the code, I tracked the other problem down to an issue with making a signed comparison against one of the new enum types that compare as unsigned.  I’m still not positive if this was the right call, since the codebase is sort of a mess with lots of vestigial code that doesn’t really do anything, and I don’t have time to clean it all up right now.


Of course, someone else is welcome to do that.  The full source code for the commercial app is available on the web site.  There was a little thought given to the fact that if I had reverted to the virgin source, the project wouldn’t be required to be under the GPL.  Wolf and the app store presents a sort of unique situation — a user can’t just compile the code and choose not to pay for the app, because most users aren’t registered developers, and the data isn’t readily available, but there is actually some level of commercial risk in the fast-moving iPhone development community.  It will not be hard to take the code that is already fun to play, pull a bunch of fun things off the net out of various projects people have done with the code over the years, dust off some old map editors, and load up with some modern quality art and sound.


Everyone is perfectly within their rights to go do that, and they can aggressively try to bury the original game if they want.  However, I think there is actually a pretty good opportunity for cooperation.  If anyone makes a quality product and links to the original Wolf app, we can start having links to “wolf derived” or “wolf related” projects. 

That should turn out to be a win for everyone.


I’m going back to Rage for a while, but I do expect Classic Doom to come fairly soon for the iPhone.

3 Tools for Better Mobile Coding Endurance

Control your Fans

We trainers and programmers might have many geek groupies, but this time I am not talking about those. 😉 The second thing to take control of is the fans that keep your CPU cool. Those rotating fans have motors that are putting a small but constant load on your battery.

Using the “About this Mac” page I was able to determine the difference between full fan speed  and lowest fan speed to be up to 100 mA. Compared to the regular energy use of around 1300 mA this gives you up to 15 minutes more working time.

Fan Control

My favorite tool to help you take control has the obvious name “Fan Control” and is available for free from Lobotomo. With this you don’t set the speed directly but with three sliders you adjust the red line which determines the RPM to use for a given CPU temperature.

Real Geeks Undervolt

While playing with settings like fan speed might have an impact on available idle time there is little you can (usually) do to extend battery time when doing something useful. Typing code lets your CPU idle most of the time anyway.

The last bastion to tackle if you posess the strong determination of geeks is undervolting your CPU. We all know that Watt = Volt times Ampere. So if we can manage to decrease the Volts necessary for the CPU then also the energy usage under load will decrease.

The tool for this purpose is CoolBook Controller which gives you such control for the price of $10. At the maximum load the CPU is using 1.1375 Volts default. CoolBook Controller has a built in testing facility that allows you to decrease the Volts for a given frequency. This way I found that my MBP can also work with 2500 MHz with as low as 1.01V, but then it would get unstable.

CoolBook Controller

In real life you would only decrease the voltage by two or three steps to not risk the system becoming unstable under stress. The makers have achieved up to 14 degrees of difference in temperature under stress. Less temperature also equals less cooling required.

But like all things concerning over-clocking or under-volting this is not for the faint of heart.

Warranty Replacement Battery Tool

According to Apple the 15″ MacBook Pro Battery is designed to retain 80% of its factory capacity after 300 loading cycles. If you are using your MBP daily and constantly like me then this number equates to approximately 6 months.

The original capacity of my (early 2008 model) MacBook Pro Battery was 5400 mAh but as of this writing it is decreased to 3112 mAh. This is way less than the 80% (4320 mAh) that are normal.

Ordinarily it would be difficult to prove to Apple that you get much less than the 3 hours of working time advertised. If it weren’t for the fabulous and free tool Coconut Battery which makes it crystal clear.
Coconut Battery Tool

Having only slightly more than half the original capacity starts to cause me problems because this means that my two hour train rides are no longer fully covered. Obviously I am going to go to my Apple authorized dealer later and send it in for warranty exchange.

Finally a Piece of Advice

Once you have gotten a new battery then you should try to discharge it fully before fully loading it. This helps to retain the maximum possible capacity. These days many people use a MacBook as Desktop replacement keeping it constantly connected to the power adapter.

The jury is still out whether such practise is good or harmful for the battery. Modern battery management should be able to minimize impact and the latest models of MacBooks don’t even allow for removal of the battery out of paranoia.

But what you should do in any case is this: at least once a week is to fully discharge your battery before fully loading at again. This “battery training” exercise allows the battery management system to calibrate and “keeps the battery juices flowing” (Apple lingo, not mine)

And all of this will increase your mobile coding stamina to its maximum, pumping those heavy Cocoa objects. Maybe just enough to have a syntax orgasm the next time you are coding on a train or plane. Good Luck!

LuckyWheel 1.0.2

New Version out now!! Get it before the success goes to our heads and we decide to raise the price.

  • added Spanish, Dutch, French, Italian proverbs
  • added Spanish, Dutch Localization
  • minor fixes

Also, Crazy Mike’s Apps graciously reviewed LuckyWheel and seems to like it, too!

He says:

“A Cool Game for the Price”.

“[…]found the puzzles to be quite challenging”

“A cool twist to this game is that it can be played in the English or German languages. You must change the language in your iPhone settings to do this, but this is a nice international option. The next Lucky Wheel version will have language options for English, German, Italian, Spanish, French, and Dutch (very cool).”

Also as of this version there is a LuckyWheel Lite that lets you play 10 word puzzles in every supported language.

Getting Standard Paths

These are the standard methods of getting the app directory and the documents directory. Remember that on the iPhone the app as well as the documents directory are “sandboxed” i.e. each app has it’s own two directories.

Here’s how you can get the path for files in your app bundle/directory:

// a regular file
NSString *plistPath = [[[NSBundle mainBundle] resourcePath] stringByAppendingPathComponent:@"File.plist"];
// this works also for localized files, gets the best matching localized variant
NSBundle *thisBundle = [NSBundle bundleForClass:[self class]]; // alternate method to get bundle
NSString *path = [thisBundle pathForResource:@"File" ofType:@"plist"];

One common mistake is to pass a file name including extension in the first parameter  of the pathForResource method. This won’t work, pass only the name without extension as first parameter and only the extension as second parameter.

And to get something from the documents directory you can do it like this:

NSArray *paths = NSSearchPathForDirectoriesInDomains(NSDocumentDirectory, NSUserDomainMask, YES);
NSString *documentsDirectory = [paths objectAtIndex:0];
NSString *plistPath = [documentsDirectory stringByAppendingPathComponent:@"File.plist"];

You’ll find yourself copy/pasting these lines all the time basically for every file that you are reading or writing.

How to Start Developing

I keep getting questions about how to best get into coding apps for the iPhone. Do I recommend books? How should one go about this?

I have one recommendation: Only steel good stuff. Download all the samples you can find on the Apple site and look them through. For most of the basic tasks you can find code to steal there, well commented.

But most importantly I recommend you get a mentor. Somebody who is slightly ahead of you in the objC programming game. But not too far ahead to feel annoyed by your questions… 😉

And that’s the last recommendation: learn to ask the right questions. Because if you ask the right questions you will find that …

40% get answered by Apple documentation
40% get answered by Google: somebody has answered the question in his blog or in a forum
15% get answered by somebody more experienced than you directly if you ask
4% you have to discover for yourself … and then hopefully you document your discovery on your blog
1% are bugs that you have discovered by accident 🙂 Those you please submit to Apple for them to fix.

When I got started with coding objC for iPhone there was next to no useful literature. And now that I have written half a dozen apps and managed to get 4 into the store I don’t think I would ever need a book. Once you know how to read and understand objC code there is nothing really that you need for reference except the sources I mentioned above.

One more thing: try to develop a network of friends who all are sharing coding for iPhone as the same hobby. Of 10 questions I asked in various forums I only got around 3-5 answered usefully. If you remember the SDK 3.0 presentation, you know that more than half of current iPhone developers are new to the platform! So you are in the same boat as most of us. Be strong! Don’t give up!


Simon asks:

I would like to loop through variables whose names end with numbers 0 to 5. What is the correct syntax for the i? I have tried variable[i], variable + i, without success

I know two methods to achieve this:

1. Put your objects into an array and then enumerate or for-loop over those

// e.g. in awakeFromNib
playerNameLabels = [[NSArray arrayWithObjects:player1NameLabel, player2NameLabel, player3NameLabel, nil] retain];
for (i=0;i&lt;3;i++)
     UILabel *nameLabel = [playerNameLabels objectAtIndex:i];
     // do something the the nameLabel

2. Use the Key-Value-Coding approach.

// in this object's header the strings are defined, here we intialize them
string1 = @"string1";
string2 = @"string2";
string3 = @"string3";
int i;
for (i=1;i&lt;3;i++)
     NSString *aName = [NSString stringWithFormat:@&quot;string%d&quot;, i];
     NSString *oneString = [self valueForKey:aName];
     NSLog(@&quot;string %d is &#039;%@&#039; and has length %d&quot;, i, oneString, [oneString length]);

The dangerous thing about the latter might be that you have construct precisely the right name for the value. Or else you will get an exception:

*** Terminating app due to uncaught exception ‘NSUnknownKeyException’, reason: ‘[<selectortestAppDelegate 0x524e80> valueForUndefinedKey:]: this class is not key value coding-compliant for the key string0.’

But actually the second approach is how Cocoa does most KVC internally.

LuckyWheel Garners Favorable Reviews

It’s only a couple of days since LuckyWheel was approved for sale on the App Store.

The first few sites that linked to the store where clearly automatic robots. iTunes gets its information in XML plist format and a couple of sites came into existence that do nothing but parse this information

I don’t know what effect those will have on sales. They might just be a modern form of spam blogs.

But what really made my day was finding a review on FingerGaming. LuckyWheel went public on the same day as “Wheel of Fortune” by Sony which aims to mimic the mechanics of the TV show by the same name. In contrast we did not try to copy something, but create a unique approach. Make a game that uses the strength of the touch interface and fill it up to the brim with proverbs in English, German, Spanish, French, Italian and Dutch.

They say:

“LuckyWheel additionally boasts a feature that Wheel of Fortune doesn’t include in any capacity — a fully fledged German-language option, complete with a localized puzzle selection full of German proverbs.”

“[…] LuckyWheel offers gameplay variety that Wheel of Fortune could never dream of.”

“LuckyWheel is a good protest purchase if you want to voice your disappointment in Wheel of Fortune[…]”

Next up in mostly positive feedback was iPhone App Reviews.net. This was the only site that actually also allowed for giving away a couple of free promo codes to their mostly US-based readers.

They say:

[…] LuckyWheel can really be pretty fun when you’re with a friend or two and having a little pass-n-play competition.

[…] Drobnik is committed to developing LuckyWheel to be as good as (or better than?) Sony’s game

Everyone who likes this kind of word puzzle but isn’t married to the TV format, get LuckyWheel. Despite its shortcomings, LuckyWheel is decent for $1.99 and hopefully it’ll grow into something that can really compete with an established franchise.

Just as welcome as professional reviews are comments by the users themselves

Chris: “I like the game. I have also tried Wheel of Fortune from Sony and have more fun playing LuckyWheel. Not because it is now free. I hope that there are more people who think the same.”

Peter: “I have also tested both games and have come to the result that LuckyWheel is the better one. Surely the graphics are not as beautiful, but why spend $4.99. So why not support LuckyWheel. Maybe a spin button would be nice, but I like spinning the wheel rather.”

We still have some promo codes available, valid on the US app store which we’ll happily provide to anyone who would like to write a review about any of our applications.

Also note that the next version has already been submitted to Apple and increases the guessing fun to all of these languages: English, German, Italian, Spanish, French and Dutch.

Drawing Text in Graphics Contexts

Sometimes you might need to draw text instead of just using a comfortable UILabel. For example if you want to show it a a specific angle. This takes a lot of code, but once you understand it, it’s just copy and paste.

- (void)drawRect:(CGRect)rect {
	CGContextRef ctx = UIGraphicsGetCurrentContext();
	CGContextSetRGBFillColor(ctx, 1, 0, 0, 1);   // inside red
	CGContextSetRGBStrokeColor(ctx, 0, 1, 0, 1);  // outline green
	double text_angle = -M_PI/4.0;  // 45 Degrees counterclockwise
	CGAffineTransform xform = CGAffineTransformMake(
		cos(text_angle),  sin(text_angle),
		sin(text_angle), -cos(text_angle),
		0.0,  0.0);
	CGContextSetTextMatrix(ctx, xform);
	CGContextSelectFont(ctx, "Helvetica", 20.f, kCGEncodingMacRoman);
	CGContextSetTextDrawingMode(ctx, kCGTextFillStroke);
	CGContextShowTextAtPoint(ctx, 100, 100, "Test Text", 9);

Of special importance is the application of a tranformation matrix via CGContextSetTextMatrix. Without it, your text will be drawn upside down. This is a feature, not a bug, because internally the iPhone still wishes that (0,0) is in the lower lefthand corner, but for most UIView-releated uses this is the “right way around”, i.e. (0,0) in the upper lefthand corner.

Angle of a Vector

When dealing with a multi-touch rotation I was searching for a simple method to calculate the angle of two fingers. Well, actually more precisely the angle between the vector from one finger to the second finger and the horizontal X Axis.

While I was still searching my friend Christian Pfandler came up with this function:

- (CGFloat)angleFromPoints:(CGPoint)pos1 otherPoint:(CGPoint)pos2
    CGPoint vector = CGPointMake(pos1.x-pos2.x, pos1.y - pos2.y);
    double angleCalc;
    if (vector.y &lt; 0)
        // upper Half
        angleCalc = atan2(-vector.y,vector.x);
        angleCalc = atan2(vector.y,-vector.x)+M_PI;
    return angleCalc;

The regular atan(x) function seem to have a limitation by only returning values between 0 and +/- PI. Because of this there is also the atan2(y,x) function which is orders of magnitude more useful. To get a continuos angle for the full circle we have to treat the upper half and the lower half seperately though. I found this here.

I don’t quite understand it, but it seems to work. 🙂 Please keep in mind though that like all angles in Cocoa Touch this is in radians as well. So not 0…360, but 0…2*PI. If you know an even simpler method, please let me know.

iPhone OS 3.0 for Developers

Today the typical dev-geek was glued in front of his web browser to get as much information as possible on the pending release of the next version of the operating system that powers all touch-enabled devices under the Apple brand. I stuck with the major two, Gizmodo and Engadget, especially because those two by now have mastered the art of interspersing illustrative photographs amongst concise journalistic commentary.

Apple claims that there are 1000 new API’s coming in 3.0 that they have been busily developing over the last year. An impressive number of news by any rate and it was put to the test by the scrutiny of many an iPhone user who threatens to leave the platform for Android because of the lack of cut&paste, stereo bluetooth, tethering, background processes and the like.

Most of those deficits will be remedied in OS 3.0, or so it seems. With an Apple twist. Background processes, no way. But amazing notification infrastructure, that is nicer to stand-by times anyway, yes. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain! Just watch and be amazed at the magic with the Apple.

As a developer I paid really close attention to what new features might work in my existing or future apps. The single most important thing I found was cut&paste. As simple as this might sound, even “standard”, as numerous are the uses I can imagine for it.

The guys on stage kept dealing out new APIs and features as if they where handing out candy.

  • Turn-based navigation will be possible … if the creator brings his own maps. Garmin, where are you?
  • “Stereo Bluetooth” aka. A2DP. Finally wireless music to my ears.
  • MMS, send voice memos, locations, vCards to other phones
  • “Spotlight” a seperate screen that searches everything on the device, even apps
  • Multiple Calendars with synching, especially noteworthy: CalDAV
  • Voice Memos, also with an external Microphone
  • Cut and Past, Shake to Undo. Copy full paragraphs e.g. from Safari
  • Push Notifications will finally enable a slew of multi-system IMs
  • Much improved Video Streaming capability with automatic best rate adaption

Lots of new APIs in OS 3.0

The bits that I thought most interesting to developers:

  • in-app e-mail support, maybe the end of the attachment shortcoming?
  • Shake API, no longer do I have to code this myself?
  • access to the users music library on the phone, probably also the voice memos
  • use the push notification API to invite other people to activites, e.g.games
  • USB/Bluetooth external-device API might allow for interesting add-on hardware possibilities
  • In-App Purchaes (iAP)! From within the app you can sell new game levels or other content
  • Access to the Proximity Sensor
  • Battery information API – maybe apps can now be smarter about how much CPU and energy they use
  • In-Game Voice – wow, about an online-multiplayer LuckyWheel that lets people talk to each other?
  • And many minor tweaks to existing classes UIAlertView, UITableView, table cells, etc.

Still there were so many more buzzwords that did not get treated with an explanation. Or do you know that those are?

  • Core Data – a new API for handling data? A nicer way to interact with Sqlite?
  • Localized Collation – Digital Alphabet Soup?
  • GPS Lingo – are they going to put even cooler GPS buzzwords into the SDK?

"We'll be back soon" says Apple while the update the developer site.

It still remains to be seen behind all these cool announcements how much liberty and creativity Apple will actually permit it’s developers to have. All these new features are really quite overwhelming for us small-time developers and it remains to be seen who of us can embrace them quickly.

Did anybody get to 1000 counting new announcements? I did not, but I am still excited.

It was also announced today that there would be a BETA available for paying developers. So far I cannot report anything about that because we are greeted with the usual “We’ll be back soon” because most likely the developer site is totally overrun by people hungry for more info.

In summary I am glad that Apple today showed that they are taking the touch platform seriously and they are willing to put in extra work to catch up to other platforms that boast many features where the iPhone fell behind. I feel reassured that I can relax and stick to developing for the iPhone because with all those shortcomings finally getting remedied the market of my potential customers will continue to grow for the foreseeable future.